This writer claims that Kuhn has become a hero to those who would describe scientific theories in terms of social constructions, and that this view is in essence a misrepresentation of the true nature of scientific discovery. Weinberg for example states that "What does bother me on rereading Structure and some of Kuhn's later writings is his radically skeptical conclusions about what is accomplished in the work of science" (Weinberg). This aspect has created a great amount of controversy. The view that this theory ultimately suggested was that science was not an ideal march of object scientific discovery into the future - but rather that science was limited and circumscribed by different phases or paradigms which were essentially separate and discrete. However this scientific idealism was sharply challenged by Thomas Kuhn's the Structure of a Scientific Revolution in 1962. (the History Guide: Lectures on Modern European Intellectual History). This view was also related to the ideology of the progress of society towards an ideal state. There was an inner logic to scientific advancement that was in line with concept of progress towards the ideal. This refers to the original view and belief that scientific discovery and analysis was part of the process of positive historical human progress. Kuhn's theory was in effect challenging a view of scientific progress that had begun with Comte and the Enlightenment. Rather, it can only supplant it." (Thomas Kuhn). ".the new paradigm cannot build on the preceding one. This means that the older paradigm is replaced by the new and the new concepts and views and the new are not compatible with the old.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |